Gresham Climate Action Plan
Live Demo42 Promises Across 6 Domains — Approved April 2024
Network Health
60
out of 100
Network Certainty
30
out of 100
Overall Grade
D-
42 promises, 24 agents
Status Breakdown
This network's assessment has high uncertainty — 42 promises have no verification mechanism or remain untested.
Domain Health
Verification Dynamics
Bayesian certainty — how confident we are in the health assessment.
Dynamical regime distribution
Verification Priorities
?Promises where verifying NOW has the highest marginal impact on network confidence.
- GRE-BE-0476%Composting risk
Update building codes and standards for new construction to support high-efficiency electric buildings and renewable energy readiness
Composting risk (k=0.43) — approaching verification window closure. 3 review periods without assessment.
Resolution expected by cycle 7Optimal review: every 5 cycles (more frequent → Zeno freeze risk)Long-term: resolution trending · P(met) at cycle 10: 50% · P(not met): 10% - GRE-UFT-0276%Composting risk
Update development codes to support Climate-Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC) state rules including parking reform and mixed-use zoning
Composting risk (k=0.43) — approaching verification window closure. 3 review periods without assessment.
Resolution expected by cycle 7Optimal review: every 5 cycles (more frequent → Zeno freeze risk)Long-term: resolution trending · P(met) at cycle 10: 50% · P(not met): 10% - GRE-SWC-0176%Composting risk
Expand curbside composting, recycling, and waste reduction programs; implement the Oregon Recycling Modernization Act requirements
Composting risk (k=0.43) — approaching verification window closure. 3 review periods without assessment.
Resolution expected by cycle 7Optimal review: every 5 cycles (more frequent → Zeno freeze risk)Long-term: resolution trending · P(met) at cycle 10: 50% · P(not met): 10% - GRE-SWC-0676%Composting risk
Implement extended producer responsibility and recycling modernization requirements per state law
Composting risk (k=0.43) — approaching verification window closure. 3 review periods without assessment.
Resolution expected by cycle 7Optimal review: every 5 cycles (more frequent → Zeno freeze risk)Long-term: resolution trending · P(met) at cycle 10: 50% · P(not met): 10% - GRE-CHR-0276%Composting risk
Develop and implement a City heat strategy; audit all City plans and code for heat mitigation; review GIS data from Growing Shade tool
Composting risk (k=0.43) — approaching verification window closure. 3 review periods without assessment.
Resolution expected by cycle 7Optimal review: every 5 cycles (more frequent → Zeno freeze risk)Long-term: resolution trending · P(met) at cycle 10: 50% · P(not met): 10%
High-Leverage Promises
Promises ranked by combined dependent count and structural bridge score (betweenness centrality).
Structural Diagnostic
Five-field analysis: epidemiology · FMEA · information theory · incentive alignment
Cascade Risk
A single violation is unlikely to cascade beyond its direct dependents.
R₀ = 0.31 (network) · R₀ hubs = 1.44
Top Risk Promises
Ranked by Risk Priority Number (RPN = Severity × Occurrence × Detection). Network reliability: 57.8%.
Severity 5 · Occurrence 5 · Detection 10
Moderate severity: failure cascades to 2 downstream promises across 1 domain. Moderate likelihood of failure based on current status (declared). Hard to detect: verification is none.
Severity 7 · Occurrence 5 · Detection 5
High severity: failure cascades to 3 downstream promises across 1 domain. Moderate likelihood of failure based on current status (declared). Moderately detectable: verification is filing.
Severity 7 · Occurrence 5 · Detection 5
High severity: failure cascades to 3 downstream promises across 1 domain. Moderate likelihood of failure based on current status (declared). Moderately detectable: verification is filing.
Severity 3 · Occurrence 5 · Detection 10
Low severity: failure cascades to 1 downstream promise across 1 domain. Moderate likelihood of failure based on current status (declared). Hard to detect: verification is none.
Severity 3 · Occurrence 5 · Detection 7
Low severity: failure cascades to 1 downstream promise across 1 domain. Moderate likelihood of failure based on current status (declared). Hard to detect: verification is self-report.
Verification Infrastructure
77% of this network's state is unobservable.
Incentive Alignment
Highest Agency Cost:
Partner with OPUC and local utilities to develop a Green Tar...
Develop green workforce training programs and pathways to cl...
Empirical Diagnostics
Calibrated from 7,193 observed state transitions (Benthos, March 2026)
Network Fragility
Hub promises — protect these first:
GRE-UFT-01, GRE-BE-01, GRE-NBE-01, GRE-BE-02, GRE-SWC-01
Zeno-Trapped Promises (21)
21 promises have no pathway to resolution:
Recommendation: add verification infrastructure or structural dependencies
Cascade Calibration
Majority of dependency edges lack coherent coupling — cascade predictions rely heavily on at-risk flagging rather than structural propagation.
Assessment
All 42 promises are declared with no compliance data yet. 50% lack verification infrastructure entirely. The plan's highest-impact strategy depends on external actors the City cannot control. Internal operations are well-structured, but the network's overall verification architecture is insufficient for the plan's ambitions. Grade reflects structural risk, not implementation failure — the plan is new and implementation has barely begun.
Lindblad projection: Based on the open quantum systems master equation fitted to 67,027 institutional commitments, 31 promises in this network are in composting dynamics (slow resolution, Zeno-sensitive) and 0 are in computing dynamics (observation-driven resolution). 31 promises are at risk of Zeno freeze — they are being monitored too frequently relative to their natural resolution timescale.
21 promises have no structural pathway to resolution
No dependencies, no verification. Adding a dependency connection or verification mechanism would move them out of stasis.
GRE-BE-03, GRE-BE-05, GRE-BE-06, GRE-BE-07, GRE-UFT-04, GRE-UFT-05, GRE-UFT-07, GRE-UFT-08, GRE-SWC-02, GRE-SWC-03, GRE-SWC-05, GRE-SWC-07, GRE-SWC-08, GRE-SWC-09, GRE-SWC-10, GRE-CHR-05, GRE-CHR-06, GRE-NBE-03, GRE-NBE-04, GRE-NBE-06, GRE-ICO-04
Want your commitments mapped like this?
We build interactive promise graphs for organizations, advocates, and policy teams.